23 May 2012
Harriett Baldwin questions the Government about the recommendations of the Copenhagen Consensus 2012 - an international project that analyses how best to spend overseas development aid - and asks how much of the UK’s spending corresponds to their analysis that tackling malnutrition provides the most value for money in terms of economic development. Harriett Baldwin (West Worcestershire) (Con): What assessment he has made of the recommendations by the Copenhagen Consensus 2012 expert panel on setting priorities for development aid. [108778] The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for International Development (Mr Stephen O'Brien): The Copenhagen Consensus 2012 is a valuable contribution to the development debate, particularly given its focus on getting the best value for money and greatest impact from aid. This is of course also a major priority for the coalition Government, and DFID’s programme priorities are closely aligned with the recommendations from the Copenhagen Consensus. I find the analysis compelling, and I have been working with the Consensus since 2004. Harriett Baldwin: The economists and Nobel laureates of the Copenhagen Consensus have found that spending on tackling malnutrition provides the most value for money in terms of economic development. How much of the Department’s budget is spent on bundled micronutrient interventions? Mr O'Brien: My hon. Friend makes an extremely important point, and she is right to say that the Copenhagen Consensus puts bundled micronutrient interventions to fight hunger and improve education at the very top of its list of the most desirable activities to achieve maximum impact. Right across our programmes, we have been increasing the delivery of nutrient supplements and fighting hunger. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State announced in Washington last week that we will be supporting the new alliance for food security and nutrition in order to improve food supply and farming across Africa and help to pull 50 million people out of chronic poverty over the next 10 years. | Hansard