West Worcestershire MP Harriett Baldwin today gave further backing for budget unveiled by the Chancellor’s this week. The MP was speaking in a debate in the House of Commons responding to proposals outlined in the budget to stimulate growth across the country. Harriett told the Commons that she had been inspired to enter Parliament having seen a previous budget delivered by then Chancellor, Gordon Brown. She said: “I vowed, as a mother, that I wanted to ensure that my children did not grow up in a country that was facing bankruptcy, and yet I failed to get here soon enough to stop the rot. “I am therefore very grateful to the Chancellor for having finally set out a path that will enable my children - and one day, I hope, grandchildren - to enjoy opportunities of the kind that I enjoyed when I left university.” The MP highlighted measures on lowering taxes for businesses as important for the recovery and added: “We therefore need to focus on private sector growth, which is why this Budget is so pivotal. A lower tax rate for businesses will bring in higher tax returns.” She also highlighted the need to fix problems with the banking sector and warned that Japan has suffered years of economic decline after failing to reform their banking system. She added: “I do not think that we can enjoy sustained economic growth until we resolve the problems with our banks. The sooner we get rid of the state's ownership of so much of the banking sector, the better it will be for the health of the economy.” FULL TEXT OF HARRIETT'S SPEECH Harriett Baldwin (West Worcestershire) (Con): I rise to speak in support of my right hon. Friend the Chancellor's historic and pivotal Budget. Today we have heard Conservative Members give examples of what a difficult hand the Chancellor has been dealt in producing a Budget. We have heard about the £120 million a day-£840 million a week-that the Government have to pay in interest. We have heard that interest has, in effect, become one of the biggest Government Departments. That is why it is so important to point out the difference between the deficit and the overall debt. In setting out the path that he did, my right hon. Friend still has to live with the fact that debt will be rising in every year of this Parliament until the last one. That means that the debt interest bill is still growing, despite the tighter economic conditions that he has imposed. I think I am probably somewhat different from other Members of this House in that I did not aspire to come here when I was a student. Indeed, I managed to survive the first 40 years of my life without it ever crossing my mind that I should stand for Parliament. Shortly after Tony Blair's second election victory in 2001, the right hon. Member for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath (Mr Brown) gave another historic Budget in which he departed from Conservative spending plans for the first time. At the same time, that Government were beginning to evaluate whether the conditions might be right to enter the euro. Those two horrors were the impetus for me to seek election to this place. I vowed, as a mother, that I wanted to ensure that my children did not grow up in a country that was facing bankruptcy, and yet I failed to get here soon enough to stop the rot. I am therefore very grateful to the Chancellor for having finally set out a path that will enable my children-and one day, I hope, grandchildren-to enjoy opportunities of the kind that I enjoyed when I left university. Enough of me; I think I should talk about the Budget. I welcome the Budget's focus on growth and the private sector. When the right hon. Member for Morley and Outwood (Ed Balls) was an adviser to the previous Prime Minister, he set out something called a neo-endogenous growth strategy. Again, I realised quite early on that the problem with such a strategy is that before long the marginal impact of increased Government spending decreases, and one runs out of money. We therefore need to focus on private sector growth, which is why this Budget is so pivotal. A lower tax rate for businesses will bring in higher tax returns. Mel Stride (Central Devon) (Con): My hon. Friend makes a powerful point about the importance of lowering taxation on businesses to provide growth. Does she agree that the Chancellor was immediately vindicated the next morning, when Sir Martin Sorrell was on the "Today" programme explaining that WPP, the world's largest advertising agency, would consider relocating to the UK as a direct result of the Budget? Harriett Baldwin: Those sentiments were echoed by businesses in my constituency, where entrepreneurs welcomed and cheered the measures set out in the Budget. I also received a communication from a non-dom in west Worcestershire-I did not think we had one, but we do. He is so pleased with the clarity of the Budget that he is going to bring lots of money in on a remittance basis to invest in businesses in the UK. I have a couple of questions for those on the Front Bench. I do not think that we can enjoy sustained economic growth until we resolve the problems with our banks. I agree with the hon. Member for Telford (David Wright), who said that Japan suffered from slow growth for many decades because it did not do anything about its banking sector. The sooner we get rid of the state's ownership of so much of the banking sector, the better it will be for the health of the economy. Given that the Financial Secretary is on the Front Bench, I will take this opportunity to read a passage from the Budget speech: I ask the Financial Secretary to raise this point with the Financial Services Authority, which we know is the regulator of many small, independent financial advisers. I suggest that he take this opportunity to suggest that small IFAs employing fewer than 10 people might be exempt from the increased regulation in the retail distribution review. In conclusion, I believe that this Budget will be seen as historically pivotal, because it will create real jobs, real growth and real prosperity. Such real prosperity can come only from investment in business and from exports. There will be exogenous growth-the exogenous growth of the private sector. I look forward to supporting the Budget in the Lobby tomorrow. | Hansard